Review and referral request engine
Happy clients get asked for a review at the exact moment they are happiest, and unhappy ones get routed to a human instead.
Idea to published, with every piece visible in its stage and nothing sitting in a draft folder for six weeks.
The problem
Content dies in the gap between written and published. Nobody knows what is waiting on whom, so everything waits on everyone.
Idea captured from any source, including a form, a Slack command, or an email.
The build
Every idea lands in one backlog with the source, the target audience, and the intended keyword.
Search volume, difficulty, business value, and effort combined into a ranking that decides what gets written next.
Writer, reviewer, and publish date set at the moment of prioritization, not later.
Stage advances when the work actually happens, driven by the doc status and the review approval, not by somebody remembering to drag a card.
Published URL, publish date, and the target keyword written back automatically.
Traffic pulled monthly. Anything decaying past a threshold enters a refresh queue rather than being forgotten.
The guard rails
This is the part that separates an automation that runs for years from one that quietly corrupts your data for a month.
Honest limits
One person writes everything and publishes it themselves. The pipeline exists to manage handoffs, and there are none.
Related builds
Happy clients get asked for a review at the exact moment they are happiest, and unhappy ones get routed to a human instead.
One approved post fans out to every channel in the right format, on the right schedule, with the approval recorded.
Registration through to post event nurture runs itself, with attendance driving which follow up somebody gets.
Send the form and we come back within 24 hours with a fixed price, a scope, and a date.